![blender trees download blender trees download](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/P8DT_xcSApE/maxresdefault.jpg)
But if these mechanics you mention are used like any other "secondary" mechanic in a game (and especially if it is a game that offers alternative approaches) then it'll fly over most people's heads and be ignored unless the game explicitly mentions it every single time.Īnd this is normal, there is only so much you can keep in your head while playing (especially if you consider how long some of these kitchensink games are and how little time per day/week some people have). But what you are describing with blood trails sounds like the regular cosmetic blood decals almost every action game has that can be easily be missed by players.īut note that i'm talking about the generic action game here, not a game designed explicitly around one of these mechanics - that is another matter since you expect it to be like that. the game has red barrels but they do not explode) then nothing bad happens. That trope is mostly harmless in that if it doesn't apply (ie. A very common example is the "red barrel = explosive barrel" trope. So most games tend to go for simple systems presented through enough smoke and mirrors to give the illusion of complexity.Īlso keep in mind that games aren't made in isolation, instead they have tropes that players are heavily relying on. Gamers tend to say that they want more complex systems but when games with complex systems come out most players either dislike them and/or go only for the most simple and straightforward approach while ignoring the rest (even if that approach isn't as fun as the more complex stuff).
Blender trees download code#
The second additional bit is that interaction with non-code assets and code is itself a grey area of copyright law, but I think there is a small consensus that it would be seen by a judge as separate independent work.įWIW these do not sound very fun, at least for most people. As a side effect, if you loose permission and distributed the work at the same time you can get sued under the crime of copyright infringement. The only thing that happens when someone breaks the condition of gpl is that you loose that permission.
Blender trees download license#
A copyright license like GPL is a document that describe when you have permission. Copyright law create by default a law against distribution. First, just like the other comment say, GPL can not force anything to be released as GPL. Last there is two more bits I would like to add. If the Blender API is closely connected to the internals of Blender then the distinction between an component and an independent work is blurred. The API aspect is also an important part of the question. Other disagree, through I do not know any case law here either so it mostly just people with different view about what the judge will say. Some say that it changes nothing and the code parts are just as dependent as if it had been dynamically linked, in which case the add-ons need to be GPL.
![blender trees download blender trees download](https://i.pinimg.com/564x/9d/cb/75/9dcb75b7f42286b08db0cb12c80cb8b4.jpg)
Python is an interpreted language so what happens here? The answer goes back to the original question, what will a judge think, and the answer is that people don't know. As such I would say the consensus is that all contributions to either of those must be under GPL.īut you are asking about blender add-ons and those are connected via the blender API that is written in python.
Blender trees download software#
Dynamic linked software could be argued as two works but FSF has a clear opinion that a judge will see the combination as a single work and has publicly stated they will bring it to the court if challenged, and so far no one has challenged them on that view.īlender core is written in C and Blender engine is in c++. The common understanding is that in a single static linked software the different source files are just components that makes for a single work. Add-ons licensing are often debated and the answer to it is sadly the subjective answer to a very specific question: Would a judge see it as part of a single work or two works that operate independently and simply interacts with each other.